TEMBA MLISWA DROPS BOMBSHELL: ZIYAMBI ZIYAMBI’S ‘GANG OF FOUR’ ACCUSED OF PLOTTING A PROCEDURAL COUP AGAINST MNANGAGWA!

HARARE — Outspoken politician Temba Mliswa has made explosive allegations against ZANU-PF Secretary for Legal Affairs Ziyambi Ziyambi and a group he calls the “Gang of Four,” accusing them of allegedly attempting to corner President Emmerson Mnangagwa through what he described as a “procedural coup” within the ruling party.

The allegations follow the sudden cancellation of a ZANU-PF Politburo meeting, which Mliswa claims was deliberately stopped to prevent an alleged internal power play against Mnangagwa.

According to Mliswa, the group had intended to push through a series of far-reaching measures without the knowledge or approval of Mnangagwa, the party’s First Secretary, or its Secretary General.

“These were not party positions; they were the product of power-hungry scheming by a group intent on cornering due process,” Mliswa said, describing the alleged manoeuvre as an ill-conceived plan that was detected and blocked before it could be executed.

WAS THE CANCELLED MEETING MORE THAN JUST A SCHEDULING ISSUE?

Mliswa’s claims add another layer of intrigue to the ongoing debate surrounding ZANU-PF’s internal power struggles, with questions emerging over who is driving key decisions within the party and whether all senior officials are on the same page.

He further alleged that the group he accused has never been genuinely committed to ZANU-PF’s “2030 agenda” and Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 (CAB3), placing their political loyalties under scrutiny.

However, Mliswa did not present publicly verifiable evidence in the statement to substantiate the alleged plot, and the accusations should be treated as claims rather than established facts.

JEALOUSY MAWARIRE DRAGGED INTO THE FIGHT

Mliswa also turned his attention to political commentators and opposition voices, singling out Jealousy Mawarire for allegedly exaggerating internal ZANU-PF disputes and portraying them as evidence of a broader political confrontation.

He accused such commentators of feeding off internal party disagreements to maintain their political relevance, arguing that they were turning internal developments into narratives that suited their own agendas.

Mliswa also criticised the alleged tendency to portray Vice President Constantino Chiwenga as the central figure in every ZANU-PF factional dispute, describing him as a “poster figure for every factional illusion”.

WHO REALLY BENEFITED FROM THE CANCELLATION?

In a twist to the political narrative, Mliswa argued that those celebrating the cancellation of the Politburo meeting had misunderstood what had happened.

Rather than representing a setback for Mnangagwa, he suggested the postponement had protected the President from being cornered by his own party officials.

His remarks raise fresh questions about the competing interests within ZANU-PF, the politics surrounding the 2030 agenda and CAB3, and the extent to which internal disagreements are shaping the party’s future.

For now, Mliswa’s allegations have added fuel to the debate over succession, loyalty and the balance of power inside Zimbabwe’s ruling party.

IS ZANU-PF DEALING WITH A ROUTINE INTERNAL DISPUTE, OR IS A MUCH BIGGER POWER STRUGGLE UNFOLDING BEHIND CLOSED DOORS?

What do you think? Is the cancelled meeting evidence of internal manoeuvring, or are political figures reading too much into the developments?

TEMBA MLISWA FIRES BACK AT JEALOUSY MAWARIRE OVER ZANU PF FACTIONAL FIGHTS: “THEY WERE PROTECTING MNANGAGWA”

FORMER MP CLAIMS CANCELLED POLITBURO MEETING THWARTED A MOVE AGAINST THE PRESIDENT AS DEBATE OVER ZANU PF SUCCESSION INTENSIFIES

Former Norton legislator Temba Mliswa has weighed in on the growing debate surrounding alleged factional fights within ZANU PF, accusing political commentators, including Jealousy Mawarire, of exaggerating internal party developments to portray President Emmerson Mnangagwa as being under siege.

In a Facebook post titled “SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT,” Mliswa challenged the narrative surrounding the cancellation of a scheduled ZANU PF Politburo meeting, arguing that the decision was intended to protect Mnangagwa rather than undermine him.

Mliswa accused what he described as opposition fringe elements of relying on alleged divisions within the ruling party to maintain their political relevance, claiming they were turning internal party discussions into evidence of a wider political crisis.

“What transpired yesterday bears no resemblance whatsoever to the sensational narrative Jealousy has desperately attempted to sell to the public,” Mliswa wrote.

He also criticised what he characterised as the tendency to portray Vice President Constantino Chiwenga as the central figure in every reported ZANU PF factional dispute.

MLISWA ALLEGES A PLOT AGAINST MNANGAGWA

In his account of the events leading to the cancellation of the Politburo meeting, Mliswa alleged that the postponement prevented a group of senior party figures from introducing constitutional changes without the knowledge or approval of Mnangagwa and the party's Secretary-General.

He identified the group as a “Gang of Four” and named ZANU PF Secretary for Legal Affairs Ziyambi Ziyambi as one of its alleged members.

According to Mliswa, the group was not genuinely committed to the 2030 agenda and Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 (CAB3), which are associated with efforts to extend Mnangagwa's political tenure.

Mliswa further alleged that the proposed constitutional changes would separate the positions of ZANU PF President and State President, potentially allowing the party leader to exercise powers over the removal of the person holding the country's presidency.

He argued that such changes would create a mechanism through which a party president could engineer the recall of a sitting State President.

“These were not party positions; they were the product of power-hungry scheming by a group intent on cornering due process,” he claimed.

These allegations remain Mliswa's account of the events and would require independent confirmation of the proposed amendments, their authorship and the circumstances surrounding the meeting's cancellation.

“A PROCEDURAL COUP” AGAINST MNANGAGWA?

Mliswa went further, describing the alleged attempt to introduce the constitutional changes as a “procedural coup” against Mnangagwa.

He maintained that the move had been detected and blocked before it could be implemented, insisting that the cancellation of the meeting was necessary to prevent what he portrayed as an attempt to weaken the President's position within the ruling party.

The former legislator argued that commentators portraying the cancelled meeting as evidence of Mnangagwa's vulnerability were misreading the situation.

In his view, the intervention was designed to protect the President from an alleged manoeuvre by people within his own political establishment.

“It is therefore deeply ironic that in their excitable haste to attack President Mnangagwa, characters like Jealousy find themselves celebrating an intervention that was in fact mounted to protect the very leader they claim is under siege,” Mliswa wrote.

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR THE ZANU PF SUCCESSION BATTLE?

The controversy comes amid continuing public debate over ZANU PF's internal power dynamics, the 2030 agenda, CAB3 and the political future of Mnangagwa and Chiwenga.

While Mliswa's post offers an alternative explanation for the cancelled Politburo meeting, it also introduces fresh allegations about divisions among senior party figures and disagreements over proposed constitutional changes.

His account challenges the interpretation that the cancellation necessarily demonstrated weakness on Mnangagwa's part. Instead, he presents it as evidence that those around the President were acting to safeguard his position.

However, the competing interpretations raise important questions: What constitutional amendments were actually due to be discussed? Who proposed them, and were they formally submitted for consideration? What reasons did party officials give for cancelling the meeting?

Until those questions are answered with verifiable evidence, Mliswa's claims should be distinguished from independently established facts.

For a party whose internal decisions can have consequences for Zimbabwe's national leadership, the dispute highlights how disagreements over succession, constitutional reform and political authority can quickly become subjects of competing public narratives.

THE BIG QUESTION: Was the cancelled Politburo meeting an effort to protect Mnangagwa from an alleged internal manoeuvre, as Mliswa claims, or does the episode point to deeper disagreements within ZANU PF over the party's future leadership?

#GreenGalaxyMedia #ZANUPF #TembaMliswa #JealousyMawarire #Mnangagwa #Chiwenga #CAB3 #ZimbabwePolitics

ZANU PF MEMBER TINO CHIBAGE NYAMHANDU TAUNTS CHIWENGA: “IF YOU ARE JEALOUS OF MNANGAGWA, YOU WILL NEVER RECOVER!”

A Zanu PF member has weighed in on the reported tensions between President Emmerson Mnangagwa and Vice President Constantino Chiwenga, declaring that anyone jealous of the President will never recover from their jealousy.

In a Facebook post, Tinotenda Chibage Nyamhandu wrote:

“UKARWADZWA NAPRESIDENT ED MNANGAGWA HAUPORE. The Zim Constitution & Zanu PF Constitution give President ED Mnangagwa authority to appoint or fire anyone. NGWENA INOITA SEYAKANYARARA ASI ICHIONA ZVAYO.”

The Shona statement means: “If you are jealous of President ED Mnangagwa, you will never recover from your jealousy.”

Nyamhandu's message also invokes the popular crocodile proverb, “Ngwena inoita seyakanyarara asi ichiona zvayo,” meaning that the crocodile may appear quiet, but it is watching everything.

The reference is to Mnangagwa's nickname, “Ngwena” (The Crocodile), and appears to suggest that the President should not be underestimated, even when he seems silent.

Although Nyamhandu did not explicitly name Chiwenga as the target of his remarks, the post has attracted attention amid growing speculation about divisions within Zanu PF over succession politics and proposed constitutional changes.

POLITBURO MEETING COLLAPSE FUELS SPECULATION

The remarks come after a Zanu PF politburo meeting scheduled for Friday at the party headquarters in Harare was abruptly abandoned after members had already gathered.

Party spokesperson Christopher Mutsvangwa and information director Farai Marapira reportedly attributed the postponement to a “clash of programmes.”

However, reports in the private media suggested that resistance from Chiwenga to proposed amendments to the Zanu PF constitution may have contributed to the meeting's cancellation.

The proposed changes are reportedly intended to align the party constitution with Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment No. 3, signed by Mnangagwa in July.

The national amendment proposes extending presidential and parliamentary terms from five to seven years, shifting the next elections from 2028 to 2030 and replacing direct presidential elections with parliamentary selection.

Unverified accounts circulating online allege that Chiwenga demanded to see the draft party amendments and questioned whether the proposed national constitutional changes originated from the people.

These claims have not been independently verified, and neither Mnangagwa nor Chiwenga has publicly commented on the alleged confrontation.

Former Norton legislator Temba Mliswa has dismissed reports of a confrontation as “absolute lies.”

“THE PRESIDENT HAS THE POWER TO APPOINT OR FIRE ANYONE”

In his post, Nyamhandu went beyond the issue of jealousy, arguing that both the national Constitution and the Zanu PF constitution give Mnangagwa the authority to appoint or remove individuals from positions of power.

Under Zimbabwe's Constitution, the President appoints Vice Presidents and has the power to remove them from office. Within Zanu PF, Mnangagwa also serves as First Secretary and wields considerable influence over party appointments.

His comments come as the ruling party prepares for its 23rd National People's Conference, scheduled for October 12–17 at Chinhoyi University of Technology, against the backdrop of increasingly intense debate over succession and the proposed extension of presidential terms.

Whether Nyamhandu's remarks were specifically aimed at Chiwenga remains unclear. Nevertheless, the timing has added another voice to the growing public debate about the relationship between Zimbabwe's two most powerful political figures.

IS THIS A WARNING SHOT IN ZANU PF'S SUCCESSION BATTLE?

With the 2028 election timetable at the centre of the constitutional debate, speculation about who will eventually lead Zanu PF continues to attract attention.

Nyamhandu's message appears to portray Mnangagwa as a leader whose position and authority should not be underestimated, while suggesting that jealousy of his power is futile.

But the bigger question remains: Is this simply a party member defending Mnangagwa, or does it reflect the growing anxiety surrounding succession politics inside Zanu PF?

CCC FACTION DISOWNS COLTART RECALL LETTERS, WARNS OF ‘EXTORTION’ PLOT

A faction of the Citizens Coalition for Change (CCC) has rejected letters sent to Parliament and the government seeking the recall of Bulawayo Mayor David Coltart, three Members of Parliament and a senator, describing the move as illegitimate and an attempt to destabilise the opposition party.

In a statement issued today, interim national spokesperson Nqobizitha Mlilo said the purported recalls had no factual, political or legal basis and did not represent the party’s position.

The letters, dated 7 October and stamped as received today, were addressed to Speaker of the National Assembly Advocate Jacob Mudenda, Senate President Senator Mabel Chinomona and Local Government and Public Works Minister Daniel Garwe.

They claimed that Coltart, Bulawayo Central MP Surrender Kapoikilu, Mbizo MP Corban Madzivanyika, Epworth North MP Togarepi Zivai Mhetu and Bulawayo Senator Kucaca Ivumile Phulu had ceased to be CCC members.

The letters subsequently called on the authorities to act in accordance with Section 129(1)(k) of the Constitution, a provision concerning the vacation of parliamentary seats under specified circumstances.

However, Mlilo's faction has distanced itself from the correspondence, alleging that certain individuals were abusing the recall process to intimidate elected representatives and force them to demonstrate political allegiance.

According to the statement, internal investigations had identified those allegedly responsible for the letters, although the faction did not publicly disclose their identities.

The faction further accused the individuals involved of attempting to destabilise the party from within, warning that their actions could amount to contempt of court.

It said lawyers had been engaged to advise on a permanent resolution to the dispute, while assuring its elected representatives that their positions remained secure until at least 2030.

TSHABANGU'S NAME RETURNS TO THE RECALL CONTROVERSY

The latest development has drawn attention because the letters reportedly bear the same Bulawayo address and CCC letterhead associated with the office of Senator Sengezo Tshabangu.

Tshabangu became a central figure in Zimbabwe's opposition politics in October 2023 after his recall letters led Speaker Mudenda to declare 15 opposition legislators' seats vacant.

The latest dispute therefore raises fresh questions about internal divisions within the CCC and the continued use of parliamentary recalls in the party's political battles.

Mlilo, who has served as Tshabangu's spokesperson since the party split, is now publicly rejecting the latest recall correspondence on behalf of his faction.

The controversy also revives an earlier dispute involving Bulawayo Mayor Coltart. Last year, Tshabangu denied reports that his faction was plotting to remove the mayor, insisting that he had no intention of ousting him.

With the latest letters now disowned by Mlilo's faction, the immediate question is whether Parliament and the Ministry of Local Government will act on the correspondence or await further clarification.

For now, the CCC's internal divisions remain in the spotlight, with rival political interests and the threat of recalls continuing to cast a shadow over the opposition party.

CCC RECALLS COLTART: IS BULAWAYO BEING CLEARED FOR MNANGAGWA-LINKED WASTE DEAL?

BULAWAYO, ZIMBABWE — The political war over Bulawayo's waste management contract has taken a dramatic turn after Mayor David Coltart was recalled from the Citizens Coalition for Change (CCC), raising fresh questions about the future of the city's refuse collection services and the growing influence of politically connected business interests.

In a letter dated 7 October 2026 and received by the Ministry of Local Government on 9 October, the CCC faction led by Mbuso Siso informed Local Government Minister Daniel Garwe that Coltart, the Ward 4 councillor, had "ceased to be a member" of the party.

The faction asked the minister to invoke Section 129(1)(k) of the Constitution, which provides for the removal of a legislator or councillor who ceases to belong to the political party under which they were elected.

But the timing of the recall has fuelled suspicion, with Coltart having been at loggerheads with fellow councillors over the proposed involvement of Geo Pomona Waste Management in Bulawayo.

WAS REFUSING GEO POMONA THE MAYOR'S BIGGEST MISTAKE?

At the centre of the controversy is Geo Pomona Waste Management, a company fronted by businessman Dilesh Nguwaya, who has been reported to have close links to President Emmerson Mnangagwa's family.

The company has announced plans to expand its operations across Zimbabwe's provinces, with Bulawayo emerging as another battleground over its proposed waste management involvement.

Coltart resisted the company's entry into Bulawayo, while a group of councillors reportedly favoured engaging the firm.

The dispute intensified as the Zimbabwe Investment and Development Agency (ZIDA) and the Procurement Regulatory Authority of Zimbabwe (PRAZ) reportedly urged the city to engage Geo Pomona.

For critics of the proposed arrangement, the mayor's removal raises an uncomfortable question: was Coltart being punished politically for refusing to support a controversial business deal?

There is, however, no independently established evidence in the information provided that the recall was orchestrated specifically to secure a Geo Pomona contract.

HARARE'S US$3 MILLION WARNING TO BULAWAYO

Bulawayo residents have every reason to pay close attention to developments in their city.

In Harare, the Geo Pomona arrangement has attracted intense public scrutiny, with the capital reportedly paying close to US$3 million per month for refuse collection and street cleaning.

Questions surrounding the costs, transparency and value for money of the arrangement have made the deal a lightning rod for criticism.

Now, with Coltart out of the way politically, residents fear Bulawayo could face similar pressures to accept a deal they have not been adequately consulted about.

Will the city insist on a transparent procurement process, competitive pricing and clear performance guarantees, or will political manoeuvres determine who manages its waste?

For ordinary residents struggling with municipal charges and service delivery challenges, the consequences could extend well beyond City Hall.

FROM DENIAL TO RECALL: WHAT CHANGED?

The recall follows months of tension between Coltart and the CCC faction associated with Sengezo Tshabangu.

The mayor had reportedly faced mounting pressure after snubbing a meeting officiated by Paul Tungwarara, an advisor to President Mnangagwa.

When reports of a possible recall first emerged, Tshabangu reportedly dismissed the claims in comments to CITE, arguing that the CCC could not unilaterally remove Coltart under the Urban Councils Act.

Yet the faction has now moved to recall him, a development likely to intensify questions about the party's internal authority and the legal basis for its decisions.

The constitutional process governing recalls, the faction's standing and any potential legal challenge could become central to the next phase of the dispute.

COLTART IS NOT THE ONLY CASUALTY

The faction has also moved against four other opposition politicians.

In separate letters addressed to Speaker of Parliament Jacob Mudenda and Senate President Mabel Chinomona, it recalled:

Ivumile Kucaca Phulu — Bulawayo Senator.

Surrender Kapoikilu — Bulawayo Central MP.

Corban Madzivanyika — Mbizo MP.

Togarepi Zivai Mhetu — Epworth North MP.

The latest recalls add to a prolonged wave of expulsions and recalls conducted in the CCC's name since October 2023.

The political consequences have been significant, with opposition representation in Parliament and local authorities repeatedly disrupted, while ZANU-PF has benefited from divisions and vacancies within the opposition.

For a movement that emerged promising an alternative to ZANU-PF's long-standing dominance, the repeated recalls have become a major source of controversy.

WHO REALLY BENEFITS FROM COLTART'S EXIT?

The central issue is bigger than the fate of one mayor.

Bulawayo now faces a critical test: will its elected representatives prioritise residents' interests, transparent procurement and affordable municipal services, or will political factionalism and pressure from powerful commercial interests shape the city's decisions?

Coltart's critics may argue that a mayor must work with fellow councillors and remain accountable to his party. His supporters, meanwhile, may see the recall as a troubling development that risks sidelining resistance to a controversial corporate arrangement.

Neither interpretation should replace scrutiny of the actual contract, procurement records and the legal grounds for the recall.

But one thing is clear: when a mayor opposing a disputed business arrangement is recalled amid a bitter political feud, residents deserve answers.

Who stands to gain from the change in Bulawayo's political leadership? Will Geo Pomona now secure a foothold in the city? And who will protect ratepayers if the cost of refuse collection rises without a corresponding improvement in service delivery?

THE BIG QUESTION: IS BULAWAYO'S WASTE MANAGEMENT DISPUTE ABOUT CLEANING UP THE CITY — OR ABOUT WHO GETS TO CASH IN?

Green Galaxy Media — Saying it as it is.

DJ OLLAH HANDED ME OVER TO JOACHIM "G6" CHIVAYO AND I WAS BADLY ASSAULTED - TECHMAG TV EDITOR IN CHIEF TONEO SPEAKS

TECHMAG TV CEO TONEO TONEO SAYS HE SUFFERED INJURIES DURING FUNERAL COVERAGE, FILES POLICE REPORT

A TechMag TV journalist has alleged that he was physically assaulted by security personnel allegedly linked to Joachim Chivhayo, popularly known as G6, while covering the funeral proceedings of the late businessman Wicknell Chivayo on Thursday, 8 October 2026.

In a detailed media statement, TechMag TV Editor-in-Chief and CEO Toneo Toneo claims that the incident occurred after a confrontation over his crew's coverage of the funeral procession.

Toneo says he sustained injuries, including loosened lower teeth, a swollen eye and severe jaw pain. He has since reported the alleged assault to Highlands Police Station under reference number RRB 6847154.

WHAT HAPPENED BEFORE THE ALLEGED ASSAULT?

According to Toneo, he and his crew had arrived at the Chivhayo residence to cover developments surrounding the funeral. He says he contacted family spokesperson Herbert Chivhayo to request an update on the programme.

Toneo claims Herbert suggested that, instead of giving an individual update, he would address journalists from various media houses at a press conference.

The TechMag TV editor says he subsequently contacted journalists from The Herald, ZBC, Owen Madondo, popularly known as DJ Ollah, and two other media practitioners to coordinate the briefing.

However, Toneo alleges that DJ Ollah later called him aside and led him to Joachim Chivhayo, who allegedly ordered him to stop recording, accusing him of conducting coverage without his clearance.

Toneo says he explained that his team had been covering the story from the scene of the helicopter crash and had continued reporting from the family residence in the days that followed.

He alleges that Joachim remained opposed to his crew's presence and insisted that they stop filming.

Toneo says he then approached Herbert Chivhayo to explain the situation. According to his account, Herbert maintained that he was responsible for authorising media coverage and insisted that journalists should not be stopped or disturbed.

The press conference subsequently went ahead before the media teams left for a funeral parlour in town to collect the bodies.

THE ALLEGED ATTACK ON GLETWIN ROAD

Toneo alleges that the confrontation escalated later as the convoy travelled along Gletwin Road, with journalists recording and broadcasting live near the hearse.

According to his statement, Joachim allegedly shouted from his vehicle: “So you guys mune nharo ka imi, I want to show you something.”

Toneo says the crew slowed down and stopped filming to establish what was happening.

He alleges that a white SUV driven by security personnel then blocked their vehicle, after which three men jumped out and attacked him while he was behind the wheel.

The journalist claims the men punched and slapped him for approximately 20 seconds before returning to their vehicle and driving away.

He further alleges that members of the funeral convoy travelling behind the hearse witnessed the incident.

The allegations have not been independently verified, and the account presented here reflects Toneo's version of events.

POLICE REPORT FILED AS LEGAL ACTION LOOMS

Toneo says he has formally reported the alleged assault to Highlands Police Station and intends to pursue the matter with assistance from his legal counsel.

He described the situation as deeply regrettable, particularly given his previous working relationship with DJ Ollah, which he says had been respectful.

The TechMag TV editor maintains that journalists should be allowed to carry out their professional responsibilities without fear of physical intimidation.

“JOURNALISM IS NOT A CRIME”

In his statement, Toneo called on authorities to investigate the incident thoroughly and ensure that anyone found responsible is held accountable in accordance with the law.

He acknowledged that families dealing with bereavement deserve respect and that journalists should observe reasonable and lawful arrangements during funeral proceedings. However, he argued that such circumstances should never be used to justify violence against media practitioners.

“Journalism is not a crime, and no journalist should be physically attacked or intimidated for documenting events and reporting matters of public interest,” he said.

He concluded by reaffirming TechMag TV's commitment to continuing its reporting despite the alleged incident.

THE BIG QUESTION: Should journalists covering high-profile funerals be required to obtain clearance from family representatives, and where should the line be drawn between a family's right to privacy and the public's right to information?

Issued by Toneo Toneo, Editor-in-Chief, TechMag TV.

US$5 MILLION SOLAR MONEY, US$90,000 SHOES AND LUXURY CARS?

A FAMILY EULOGY HAS NOW PUT THE SPOTLIGHT ON THE MYSTERY SURROUNDING THE US$5 MILLION GWANDA SOLAR PROJECT MONEY — AND WHERE IT ALLEGEDLY WENT.

During his eulogy for his late brother Wicknell Chivayo today, Joachim Chivayo, popularly known as G6, made startling claims about the businessman’s extravagant spending after receiving money connected to the Gwanda Solar Project.

According to G6, Wicknell allegedly went on a spending spree within weeks, splashing money on luxury cars, expensive overseas holidays and even a pair of shoes reportedly costing US$90,000, bought in Dubai.

But the most explosive claim concerns the US$220,000 that G6 says he personally lent Wicknell for the project.

G6 reportedly said Wicknell had promised to repay him US$1 million, but ultimately failed to do so.

And here is where the questions become difficult to ignore:

The Gwanda solar project was never delivered.

Yet, according to the account given at the funeral, enormous amounts of money were allegedly spent on luxury and personal extravagance.

Although Wicknell was previously cleared by the courts of criminal wrongdoing in connection with the matter, the unanswered questions surrounding the project, the money and the subsequent spending have continued to attract public scrutiny.

Now comes the bigger question:

WHO WILL FOLLOW THE MONEY?

If an accountable state is serious about transparency, should the late businessman’s estate be subjected to a thorough investigation to establish the legitimate sources of his wealth and trace funds connected to major public projects before the estate is distributed to beneficiaries?

The questions raised by G6’s own eulogy may prove impossible to bury with Wicknell.

US$5 MILLION. US$90,000 SHOES. LUXURY CARS. A PROJECT THAT NEVER MATERIALISED.

Zimbabweans will be asking one simple question: WHERE DID THE MONEY GO?

The claims regarding the money, spending and loan arrangement are attributed to Joachim “G6” Chivayo’s eulogy !